Current:Home > StocksFDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men -EverVision Finance
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
TradeEdge View
Date:2025-04-08 09:10:40
Updated 12:55 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued proposed guidance Friday to ease restrictions on blood donations by men who have sex with men.
The change is expected to take effect after a public comment period.
The restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV. Originally, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. Over time, the FDA relaxed the lifetime ban, but still kept in place some limits.
Under the current policy — last updated in 2020 — men who have sex with men can donate blood if they haven't had sexual contact with other men for three months.
The new proposed policy would eliminate the time-based restrictions on men who have sex with men (and their female partners) and instead screen potential donors' eligibility based on a series of questions that assess their HIV risk, regardless of gender. Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible.
The risk assessment would include questions about anal sex. Potential donors who've had anal sex in the last three months with a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner would not be eligible to give blood.
The changes are aimed at addressing criticism that the current policy is discriminatory and outdated, as well as one more barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply. Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
"We are moving now to an inclusive policy for blood donation," said Dr. Peter Marks, who leads the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA during a briefing Friday.
"We will continue to work to make sure that we have policies that allow everyone who wants to donate blood to be able to donate blood within what the science allows to make sure that the blood supply remains safe."
In crafting the new guidance, the FDA has been looking to the results of a study of about 1,600 gay and bisexual men to develop screening questions that can identify potential donors who are most likely to be infected with HIV.
Reaction to the news from advocates, medical groups and blood banks has been positive.
"The blood community is very excited about the proposed changes," says Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers. "We have advocated for a decade now for a move to an individual risk assessment model. So this is very welcome by blood centers across the country."
She stressed that all donated blood is carefully screened for HIV and that testing has improved dramatically to ensure the safety of the blood supply.
For many years, the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a change to the federal rules on blood donations.
"These changes are 40-plus years in the making and they're a tremendous leap forward in elevating science over stigma," says Tony Morrison, a spokesperson for the advocacy group GLAAD.
But GLAAD and other groups say the changes still don't go far enough. They argue that some of the remaining restrictions are still unnecessary and stigmatizing, such as the prohibition against donations by people taking medication PrEP to prevent HIV.
"When we limit and defer people who are being proactive in their sexual health that stigmatizes them. The misconception is that people on PrEP are promiscuous or have a higher risk of HIV infection — that's categorically false," says Morrison.
So his group will continue to lobby the FDA to further ease restrictions.
The proposed changes in the blood donation rules will be open for public comment for 60 days. The FDA will then review those comments and issue a final rule, probably later this year. So monogamous gay men could start donating blood again sometime in 2023.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- 4 new books by Filipino authors to read this spring
- New moai statue found in Easter Island volcano crater: A really unique discovery
- American Girl Proclaims New '90s Dolls Are Historic—And We're Feeling Old
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- 'The Wind Knows My Name' is a reference and a refrain in the search for home
- Earth, air, fire, water — and family — are all 'Elemental' for Pixar's Peter Sohn
- 12 Gifts That Every Outer Banks Fan Will Fall In Love With
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Prince Harry and Meghan keep decision on attending King Charles III's coronation to themselves
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- The Irony Of the Deinfluencing Trend All Over TikTok
- Secrets of the National Spelling Bee: Picking the words to identify a champion
- Ariana DeBose Pokes Fun at Her Viral Rap at SAG Awards 2023
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Dakota Johnson Is 50 Shades of Chic at Milan Fashion Week
- Beauty culture in South Korea reveals a grim future in 'Flawless'
- Emily Blunt’s Floral 2023 SAG Awards Look Would Earn Her Praise From Miranda Priestly
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Vanity Fair's Radhika Jones talks Rupert Murdoch and Little House on the Prairie
All the Times Abbott Elementary's Sheryl Lee Ralph Schooled Us With Her Words of Wisdom
What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend reading, listening and viewing
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
What we know about the 4 Americans kidnapped in Mexico
We recap the Succession finale
20 Affordable Amazon Products That Will Make Traveling Less Stressful